m***@accenture.com
2008-07-22 17:06:57 UTC
Hi, I contacted Craig to know something about Shale 1.1. He talk about
the 1.1 version is in the trunk. Is the same trunk you are using for
version 1.0.5?
Thanks
Mario
________________________________
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:***@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 luglio 2008 19.02
To: Buonopane, Mario
Subject: Re: Where is Shale 1.1?
***@accenture.com wrote:
Craig, can I forward your response to Shale user mailing list?
Sure, go ahead.
Craig
Ciao
M.
________________________________
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:***@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 luglio 2008 19.13
To: Buonopane, Mario
Subject: Re: Where is Shale 1.1?
***@accenture.com wrote:
Hi Craig, how are you? Sorry for disturbing you another time with Shale,
I know you are enjoying with RubyOnRails but I need some help and I
think you are the only person can give me!
I'm doing well, and definitely enjoying myself. I'm also doing a bit of
Java along with Rails stuff, but it's all about building servers, not
building frameworks or applications.
The question is:
The Shale community is working on 1.0.5 release, but when you left Shale
we are working on version 1.1. Do you remember?
I think that version is lost!
What can we do? I'm afraid we lost all fixes and enhancement of 1.1!
All of the changes made so far have been checked in to the trunk of
Shale's code in the repository. All you would need to do is check out
the trunk and build it yourself. Or, bug the developers to get the
nightly builds working again (which would build the same bits) ... but
you're more likely to get the bits faster if you build it locally from
source.
Craig
Please help us.
Ciao
Mario
Mario Buonopane
Accenture Insurance Services & Systems
Via C. Colombo 112, 00147 Roma
Tel: +39 06 51566543
Mobile: +39 334 6563433
Fax: +39 06 51566550
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
the 1.1 version is in the trunk. Is the same trunk you are using for
version 1.0.5?
Thanks
Mario
________________________________
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:***@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 luglio 2008 19.02
To: Buonopane, Mario
Subject: Re: Where is Shale 1.1?
***@accenture.com wrote:
Craig, can I forward your response to Shale user mailing list?
Sure, go ahead.
Craig
Ciao
M.
________________________________
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:***@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 luglio 2008 19.13
To: Buonopane, Mario
Subject: Re: Where is Shale 1.1?
***@accenture.com wrote:
Hi Craig, how are you? Sorry for disturbing you another time with Shale,
I know you are enjoying with RubyOnRails but I need some help and I
think you are the only person can give me!
I'm doing well, and definitely enjoying myself. I'm also doing a bit of
Java along with Rails stuff, but it's all about building servers, not
building frameworks or applications.
The question is:
The Shale community is working on 1.0.5 release, but when you left Shale
we are working on version 1.1. Do you remember?
I think that version is lost!
What can we do? I'm afraid we lost all fixes and enhancement of 1.1!
All of the changes made so far have been checked in to the trunk of
Shale's code in the repository. All you would need to do is check out
the trunk and build it yourself. Or, bug the developers to get the
nightly builds working again (which would build the same bits) ... but
you're more likely to get the bits faster if you build it locally from
source.
Craig
Please help us.
Ciao
Mario
Mario Buonopane
Accenture Insurance Services & Systems
Via C. Colombo 112, 00147 Roma
Tel: +39 06 51566543
Mobile: +39 334 6563433
Fax: +39 06 51566550
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.